Skip to main content

The Experiential Simulation Course Checklist, Part 1

When developing courses to meet the requirements for experiential simulation courses, there are three ABA standards that come into play: Standard 303(a)(3), Standard 302, and Standard 304.

When combined, there are eight bullet points that one must meet to comply with the standards for experiential simulation courses**:
  1. "Primarily experiential in nature" (Standard 303(a)(3)):  To meet this bullet point, an ABA Guidance Memo provides additional help. It notes that the "primarily" suggests "more than simply inserting an experiential component into an existing class." Furthermore, the "primarily" "indicates the main purpose of something." It is clear that the experiential nature of the course should be central to the course's design and should be prevalent across the entire length of the course. In fact, the ABA notes that the "experiential nature of the course should . . . be the organizing principle of the course, and the substantive law or doctrinal material that is part of the course should be incidental to it, not the other way around."
  2. Provides "substantial experience not involving an actual client, that is . . . reasonably similar to the experience of a lawyer advising or representing a client or engaging in other lawyering tasks" developed by a faculty member (Standard 304): There are many skills that are "reasonably similar" to lawyering tasks--including research, which new attorneys spend approximately 35% of their time conducting. This standard makes it clear that the class cannot be lecture-forward--students must be engaging in lawyering tasks. The performance of skills must have an emphasis in these courses. The ABA Guidance Memo makes clear that this is likely met if the course meets the "primarily experiential in nature" criteria.
  3. Integrates "doctrine, theory, skills, and legal ethics, and engage students in performance of one or more of the professional skills identified in Standard 302" (Standard 303(a)(3)): Simulation courses must combine doctrine and theory with skills and ethics; this tells us that while lecture must not be the central teaching method in the course, it's likely that there will be a lecture component to teach doctrine and theory. These courses must also engage students in one of the professional skills listed in Standard 302, such as "legal analysis and reasoning, legal research, problem-solving, and written and oral communication."
  4. Develops "concepts underlying the professional skills being taught" (Standard 303(a)(3)): This point tells us that the course cannot focus solely on the practice of skills in a vacuum; some time must be spent tying skills back to the concepts underlying those skills.
  5. Provides "multiple opportunities for performance" (Standard 303(a)(3)): This implies multiple exercises or assignments for the students, but there is no suggested amount of practice outlined in the ABA standards. However, due to the experiential nature of the course being the "main purpose" of the course, one can infer that instructors should err on the side of regular opportunities for students to practice their skills during the course.
  6. Provides "opportunities for self-evaluation" (Standard 303(a)(3) & Standard 304): This implies more than one activity requiring students to engage in reflection about their performance, in an effort to learn to critique their own work.
  7. Includes "direct supervision of the student's performance" by and "feedback from a faculty member": (Standard 304): This suggests that class size for a simulation course shouldn't be too large; in a class of 70, for example, it would be challenging for the faculty member to have direct supervision over all the students. Students in simulation courses should be getting some kind of written or oral comments on their work from their professor over the length of the course designed at helping the student to improve their lawyering skills.
  8. Includes "a classroom instructional component" (Standard 304): The ABA explains that the classroom component must be "fairly rigorous" if it will allow for the "integration of doctrine, theory, skills, and legal ethics," and for the "develop[ment] of the concepts underlying the professional skills" being taught. It further recommends that the classroom instructional component includes assignments, learning outcomes, and assessment. The ABA Guidance Memo clarifies, however, that the classroom requirement doesn't have to meet the "not less than one hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction . .  . per week for fifteen weeks" for each credit of the course; as such, the "classroom instructional component" doesn't have to equal the prescribed number of class hours.
In incorporating these eight criteria into their simulation courses, professors are meeting the baseline requirements of experiential simulation courses. Next time, we'll talk about some of the challenges in actually meeting these requirements--specifically for legal research courses.

See Part 2 on how to balance "experiential in nature" and "the classroom instructional component."

**Adapted from Alyson M. Drake, The Need for Experiential Legal Research Education, 108 Law Library J. 511, 527 (2016), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2753172

Popular posts from this blog

Spaced Repetition & Interleaved Practice in Legal Research Instruction

Researchers refer to single-minded practice as "massed practice." This concentrated practice is thought to embed skills into memory. Unfortunately, while many students and teachers believe this to be the best way to learn, research doesn't support that idea. The problem with massed practice is that it is often accompanied by quick forgetting. Practice is important, but it is considerably more effective when it's spaced out--there's better retention and mastery.

It can be tough to convince our students of the benefits of spaced repetition. As Brown et al. point out in Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning:

 "[T]hese benefits come at a price: when practice is spaced, interleaved, and varied, it requires more effort. You feel the increased effort, but not the benefits the effort produces. Learning feels slower from this kind of practice, and you don't get the rapid improvements and affirmations you're accustomed to seeing from massed practi…

Rethinking Learning Outcomes in Legal Research Courses

Learning outcomes have obvious value to our institutions.  ABA Standard 301 requires that law schools "establish and publish learning outcomes" that are designed to prepare students for "effective, ethical, and responsible participation" in the legal profession.  Usually, individual course outcomes should then align with these school-wide learning outcomes.  We include these learning outcomes in our syllabi to show our compliance with the ABA standards in our accreditation visits.  But learning objectives can, or at least should, also have a pedagogical benefit.  After all, we are including them in our syllabi for a reason--to give our students an idea of the learning experience they are about to have in the course. They should also give students a clear picture of what they should be taking with them from the course into the actual practice of law.

As Edmund J. Hansen writes in Idea-Based Learning: A Course Design Process to Promote Conceptual Understanding, the w…

Battling Law Students' Fixed Mindset

Many students show up to law school with fixed mindsets--the belief that each person is born with a particular intellectual ability and that they there is little to nothing one can do to surpass that innate intellectual level.  A large proportion of law students were classified as smart early on in their learning experiences and have been academically successful their entire educational careers.  Many faculty members had a similar experience as they advanced from primary school to secondary school to undergrad and finally to law school--where most continued to succeed academically.

For some law students, however, law school is the first time in their lives that they have struggled to succeed immediately.  This can have a disastrous result, because those with fixed mindsets have a tendency to equate mistakes with failure.  These students then have a tendency to avoid challenging themselves, to ignore constructive criticism, and to give up or not try.[1]  In their minds, they are just n…

Using Backward Design in Course Development

There are different methods instructors use to design their courses. In his book Creating Significant Learning Experiences, L. Dee Fink identifies three major approaches:
In the first approach, the instructor picks out some number of major topics within their course subject matter, then preps lectures for each topic. Then he or she adds in a final exam and sometimes a midterm, and the course is ready to go.  Fink notes that this approach is less time-consuming, but "pays little or no attention to the quality and quantity of student learning." [1] He explains that this type of learning "has a relatively short half-life and, more significantly, does not meet the educational needs of students and society today." [2]In the second approach, instructors still designs their course around major topics, but rather than focusing solely on lectures, he or she incorporates a variety of active learning opportunities. This approach is more engaging for students, but it still does…

Four Aspects of Effectual Teaching (& Why Instructional Design Is the One Missing In Many Law Courses)

There are four general components of teaching, which all must come together for a teacher to be successful:
Knowledge of the Subject Matter: Most instructors in higher education have this covered. The largest potential hurdle of this aspect of teaching is perhaps remembering to view the material from the perspective of the beginner learner, as opposed to from the teacher's own advanced learner status. In my first year of teaching, I found this to be an issue, as I jumped over steps that were so obvious to me that I didn't even notice them anymore. It was only by students asking questions that illustrated I was missing an important step in their comprehension and by watching the legal writing professor I co-taught with that I began to break down my material into pieces that were more digestible for my students.

Interaction with Students: Instructor-student interaction can take a myriad of forms. As L. Dee Fink writes in Creating Significant Learning Experiences,

"Teacher-stud…