Skip to main content

Helping Students Learn to Learn

One aspect of learning that I see students struggle with the most is applying the skills they have learned to new scenarios or situations. It is critical that students are equipped with the ability to continue to advance in their profession and in their knowledge after they have left our courses and law school altogether. This is true for two reasons. First, it's not possible for students to learn everything there is to know about the law--or even one topic within the law--during the course of law school. There's simply too much content to learn; the best we can hope for is to identify the fundamental knowledge for our subject areas and do our best to make sure our students know that material. Second, even if they could learn everything, they would have to be able to continue to learn as new areas of law emerge and preexisting areas of law evolve.

In his book, Creating Significant Learning Experiences, L. Dee Fink identifies three different meanings for "learning how to learn":
  1. Learning how to be a better student: There are a number of excellent resources out there on how to help students learn how to succeed in higher education, including Saundra McGuire's Teach Students How to Learn: Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve Student Metacognition, Study Skills, and Motivation (2015).
  2. Learning how to construct knowledge in different domains of inquiry: This is why law school focuses so heavily on legal analysis. We're helping students learn how to ask and answer their own questions. But an important aspect of this is helping students know how to seek out information that will allow them to answer those questions--legal research. Demonstrating to students that the legal research is inextricably tied to analysis is a key step in helping student learn how to keep learning.
  3. Learning how to be a self-directing learner: Finally, Fink discusses the need for students to be what he calls self-directing learners. He uses the phrase "self-directing" as opposed to "self-directed" to emphasize that the students are active participants in this process. He writes that there are two prongs to students' abilities to become self-directing: 1) They must be able to diagnose their own needs and 2) they must be able to design a learning plan.[1]  As such, self-reflection is a critical component to self-directed learning. Students must be able to analyze what they need to learn, and then reflect back on their previous legal research experience to discern what worked well and what did not for answering their questions, and consider what is likely to be successful for their current learning needs.

    Fink looks to Phil Candy's 1991 research on self-directed learning and proposes some strategies teachers can use to help students become better self-directed learners:
    • "Make use of learners' existing knowledge structure.
    • Encourage deep-level learning.
    • Increase questioning by the learners.
    • Develop their critical thinking capabilities.
    • Enhance their reading skills.
    • Enhance their comprehensive monitoring (of their own learning)." [2]
All of these types types of learning are skills students should practice throughout their legal education. Given that research is key to at least two of the types of "learning to learn", incorporating much more research-based analysis into students' legal education beyond the first year is necessary for their future success.


[1] L. Dee Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses 59 (2013).

[2] Id. at 60.

Popular posts from this blog

How Having a Textbook Can Help Law Students Be More Engaged Learners

In my time teaching legal research and analysis, I have gone back and forth on whether to have a required textbook or any required readings. For me, research courses are most effective when they are practice-focused, but the right textbook or readings can help students prepare to use the resources we are teaching. But it can be frustrating to plan a class on the basis that the students have actively done the reading, only to find out that they at best skimmed it. As I look forward to next year's classes, I have once again begun to contemplate whether or not to require a text. 

For legal research courses, a textbook can help the course have legitimacy. The optics are good; law students may see the course as more substantive and therefore more worth their time. But requiring a textbook (yet another expense for students) is superfluous if the students aren't engaging with it effectively, or at all.

I started doing some background reading on the value of utilizing textbooks and the …

Four Aspects of Effectual Teaching (& Why Instructional Design Is the One Missing In Many Law Courses)

There are four general components of teaching, which all must come together for a teacher to be successful:
Knowledge of the Subject Matter: Most instructors in higher education have this covered. The largest potential hurdle of this aspect of teaching is perhaps remembering to view the material from the perspective of the beginner learner, as opposed to from the teacher's own advanced learner status. In my first year of teaching, I found this to be an issue, as I jumped over steps that were so obvious to me that I didn't even notice them anymore. It was only by students asking questions that illustrated I was missing an important step in their comprehension and by watching the legal writing professor I co-taught with that I began to break down my material into pieces that were more digestible for my students.

Interaction with Students: Instructor-student interaction can take a myriad of forms. As L. Dee Fink writes in Creating Significant Learning Experiences,

"Teacher-stud…

Fighting Law Students' Cognitive Dissonance

I remember being told at some point, either during law school or my early teaching days, that there was a study of law students where it was determined that 90% of law students believe that they will graduate in the top 10% of their class. Obviously, at least 80% of them are wrong, and that's assuming that none of the 10% who don't predict their top-10% success end up in the top of their class.

As such, cognitive dissonance can be a huge detriment to student learning in law school.  When students don't receive the grades they believe they will--or should--receive, most are unable to process it. As Saundra Yancy McGuire puts it in Teach Students to Learn: Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve Student Metacognition, Study Skills, and Motivation,

If our courses are telling these students that they're not the smart, competent individuals they believed themselves to be, what do they do? Their normal psychological self-defense mechanisms activate. They be…

Six Reasons Why Individual Research Conferences Are A Good Idea

I hear from a number of my fellow law librarians that they don't like doing research conferences with their students. The number one reason I hear for why is that they take up a tremendous amount of time--which is completely fair, given time is a commodity most law librarians are short on.

For me, the benefits of research conferences far outweigh the time needed to perform them. Here are just a few reasons why I include them in my research courses:

1.  As I've already noted elsewhere, they are a great way for instructors to model for their students how to collaborate and communicate in a way similar to what they'll do in practice. Conferencing is a lawyering skill that students need to practice during their legal education.

2.  Individualized feedback is critical to student learning (and it's required under the ABA Standards for experiential simulation courses).  Research conferences allow us to provide feedback in an atmosphere that all but guarantees that our student…