Skip to main content

Revamping the Lecture

Lecturing has a bad name in today's world of experiential learning, but it's an often necessary component to legal research classes as students have to have some bibliographic information before we jump into the databases. As I conclude one semester and begin prepping for the next, I've been doing a lot of reading on how I can make my lectures more effective and engaging learning experiences for my students.

As Todd Zakrajsek notes in his 2017 Teaching in Higher Ed podcast on Dynamic Lecturing, "You can't just take bad examples of something and claim that the whole concept is bad." Instead, we should focus on what makes a lecture compelling for our students in our course planning and evaluate our lectures after our classes for their efficacy, reflecting on what worked well and what didn't.

So how can we make the most of our lectures?  Here's a few ideas I've come across:
  1. Make your objectives clear to your students. Don't hide the ball--let your class know the goals of this lecture, what they should know when you're finished, and why that's important to the overarching goals of the class.
  2. Engage students from the start of the lecture. Use storytelling to humanize what you're teaching. Legal research may not be the most exciting subject matter for all our students, but if you can tie statutory research to a story from practice or citators to an instance where someone was embarrassed in court for not finding an authority (think Marcia Clarke and Judge Ito). Social media can also be fantastic for examples to share with your class. #LawTwitter, #AppellateTwitter, and #PracticeTuesday often bring up examples of attorneys sharing stories from their experiences in practice.
  3. Vary your presentation methods. Powerpoint is easy for many of us because we're used to it, but don't default to it just because it's familiar. (I'm often guilty of this as I try to juggle all of my administrative library responsibilities with all of my tenure requirements--there's never enough time. Join me in my pledge to use less PowerPoint next semester--try a new format for at least one lecture.) Consider what formats might work best for the topic you're presenting--your students will appreciate it and it'll freshen things up for you. 
  4. Check in with your audience effectively. Be in touch with your audience and their experience.  Rather than asking if there are any questions at the end of the lecture to see if the class is still with you, intersperse your lecture with more effective questions for the class: "What parts of this are still a little confusing for you?" Even asking "What questions do you have?" instead of "Do you have any questions?" can lead to more queries from your class. Toward the end of class, try a "minute paper" assessment: ask students to respond in one or two sentences to a question, such as "What stood out to you as the most important concept in today's lecture?" or "What are you confused about?" Spend a few minutes reviewing the responses and you'll learn a lot about how your students are learning.
  5. Use appealing handouts as a visual aid and a tool for students to follow your lecture. This past semester, we started using guided notes handouts in our first year legal research workshops, which allowed students to fill in key information as they listen. They liked them as a tool to stay on track with the presentation and ensure they were walking with the most pertinent information. We thought this might help them listen more carefully to the lecture, but instead they focused on filling in the worksheets from the Powerpoint (maybe I should just get rid of the Powerpoint). If you're going to go the guided notes route, make sure you include points to be filled out based on what you're saying, not providing all the information they need on the board/screen.
  6. Keep them short! Most topics we're teaching in legal research can be taught quickly. The history of Shepard's in print might be interesting to us, but your students do not care. Their attention span is less than 15 minutes, so you should not be talking for longer than that. They want to know only what they practically need to know to conduct legal research and analysis. Hit the key points and transition to the active learning component where they put those skills to the test. Consider the "change up" method, which advises that you split the class up with that attention span in mind. In a class of 50 minutes, you should change up the lesson at least twice, moving to a different type of learning.

Popular posts from this blog

Letter to A First-Time (Legal Research) Instructor

Dear Friend, Seven years ago this week, I was prepping madly to teach my first legal research class.  Three months earlier, I'd been a law student myself.  To say that I was nervous is an understatement; mildly terrified was probably a more apt description.  The truth is I didn't really know what I was getting myself into, but I knew that I wanted to teach legal research differently than I had been taught legal research, where at best it was viewed as a skill less important than everything else being taught at law school and at worst an afterthought, a skill that students should be able to do with very little training.  There are many points I wish I knew then that I know now and that's what I want to share with you toda y.  First and foremost, students will forgive many imperfections in the classroom if they know you care about their learning.  At the start of every semester, I re-read Kent Syverud's " Taking Students Seriously: A Guide for New Law Teachers

Why Experts Can Struggle to Teach Novices

This week in our Slack group on teaching , there was an interesting discussion about expertise and the amount of time needed to prep for instruction. I mentioned something that I recalled reading: that experts can be less effective in teaching novices because often the expert skips cognitive steps that the novice learner needs to understand.  I thought I'd dig into this a little more today on the blog. The fact is novices and experts learn very differently.  The major reason for this is that experts not only know a lot about their chosen discipline, but they understand how that discipline is organized. As such, what has a clear structure to the expert is a jumbled set of unorganized information to the novice.  The information presented to novices "are more or less random data points."[1]  In contrast, when the expert learns something new in her area of expertise, she just plugs it into the knowledge structure that already exists in her long-term memory. Because the new

Motivation in the Legal Research Classroom

Motivating students in the legal research classroom can be a challenge. As we know, there are many false narratives surrounding students' conceptions of legal research's importance, interest level, and ease, all of which can result in a decrease in students' motivation to engage in this subject matter. There are two types of motivation--intrinsic and extrinsic.  Extrinsic motivation occurs when students are motivated by an outside reward or punishment;[1] in instruction, this is often the grades students will get on research assignments or the participation points they might receive for actively engaging with in-class exercises.  Intrinsic motivation , on the other hand, occurs when students are interested in the topic for its own sake.[2] Due to legal research's false narratives, students entering our classrooms tend to be drive primarily by extrinsic motivation.  The problem is, as Julie Dirksen aptly notes in her excellent book Design for How People Learn , &qu

Reflection in the Legal Research Classroom

Reflection is a critical component of experiential learning.  We see in ABA Standard 303 that experiential courses must include multiple opportunities for self-evaluation.  Self-evaluation is critically important to legal research.  Students must reflect on and assess their research methodology each time they research to continue becoming more efficient legal researchers and to determine what research strategies work best in which situations. [1] Reflection relates to several ideas found in cognitive theory that have been shown to result in stronger learning and retention: Retrieval : recalling recently-learned information;  Elaboration : finding a nexis between what you know and what you are learning; and  Generation : putting concepts into your own words and/or contemplating what you might do differently next time. I've been contemplating how to better incorporate reflection into legal research classes. At the beginning of this semester, at the recommendation of a works

Cognitive Disruptors in Legal Education

The pandemic has had a significant impact on all of our lives (biggest understatement ever).  However, with the return to in-person learning at many institutions, there has been this feeling that we should have returned to our "normal" teaching strategies in an effort to get back to the way things were. But of course, we know that things are not the same.  People traumatized by the pandemic--loved ones being gravely ill and dying, extreme isolation, financial stressors due to industries being impacted, and more--are experiencing lingering effects of the past two years.  Burnout has become the buzz word, as entire circles of friends and colleagues report feeling emotionally, physically, and mentally exhausted. This means that our classrooms should not go back to normal.  We must consider what might be impacting our students' ability to attend to and retain new information presented in our classrooms.  I've written before about cognitive (over)load and the limits of wo