Skip to main content

Making "Thinking Time" for Curricular Development

In academia, we often hear faculty discuss the need to find time to write.  I've recently been reading Helen Sword's Air & Light & Time & Space, in which she discusses the need for those very things in writing.  In the first chapter, she notes, "[A]cademics talk constantly about making time, finding time, carving out time to write. We fantasize about having more of it, and we bemoan our chronic lack of it."[1]

I find the same is true for developing and assessing curricular programming. As librarians, true public servants, our profession is rooted in our service to others. Even if we are not scheduled for the reference desk or to attend a meeting, our "availability" is our calling card and in some cases our badge of honor.  It's expected that we will stop what we're doing should a patron come to our door or call on the phone.

The problem is that without free time to think, to think uninterrupted, we cannot innovate.  We keep with the status quo because what we're doing now has served us okay in the past and we are barely keeping our head above water balancing the many interrelated aspects of our jobs. I've recently had many conversations with other librarians about the fact that, with smaller budgets and staff sizes, many of us are doing two to three jobs.  There were so many points this past semester when I was only prepping in the hour or so before class, simply relying on last year's materials.  This is not the kind of teacher I want to be, but mid-to-late semester I didn't find I had the wherewithal to do more. For one of our programs I was struggling simply to get materials ready for the others who teach in the program.

It's had me thinking about what I can do to build time into my schedule to think and plan--not just update materials from previous semesters or review my slides from last year.  It is necessary if our library's educational programming is going to continue to move forward, which I very much hope it will both for our students and for myself.  In the past few weeks, as I've reclaimed some of that time and thought deeply about the future our various instructional programs, I've been more energized and excited than I've been for months.  Thinking time can reinvigorate us and remind us what excites us about librarianship.

In Sword's book, she mentions a number of reasons why adopting a daily writing routine is beneficial: (1) it helps battle procrastination; (2) it demystifies the writing process; (3) it keeps research at the forefront of your mind; (4) it helps you develop new ideas; (5) it adds up incrementally; and (6) it helps you figure out what you want to say.[2]  All of these reasons can be analogized to instructional planning as well.  Taking time to think daily (or at least on a regular, scheduled basis) about instruction is a key ingredient for making us better teachers and for developing courses, workshops, or educational programs that will most benefit our students.

Summer, traditionally a bit quieter than the rest of the academic year, is a good time to begin building new habits, but how can we start to build thinking time into our daily schedules?  There are a few things I'm going to try.  The first thing is moving offices (I realize this is not a possibility for everyone).  I'm currently in an office that has three doors--two to the Circulation Desk/reserves area and one to the law library's Collaborative Commons.  This means I'm central to the hub of activity in the library and that dozens of interruptions per day is common--even when I'm not the on-call librarian.  We had an empty office in a less public space in the law library, so I approached my director about moving to give me more time and space to think--and ultimately be more beneficial to the law library.  Luckily, I have a director who values my need to think and helped to make arrangements for me to find that time.

As a profession, we need to be willing to have more transparent conversations with our colleagues about our needs and to be open to finding solutions that allow us to do our best work.  While moving offices may not be an option, there may be other ways to find time to think--brainstorm them and then talk to your supervisor about them.  Maybe you think best in the afternoon and want to avoid continuing to be scheduled for reference shifts at that time.  Maybe your library has an open-door policy, but you can carve out certain times each week when you can shut your door or even go to another location where you're less likely to be disturbed.

The second thing I'm doing is scheduling thinking time into my calendar, separate from class prep time.  My brain is most capable of doing deep thinking first thing in the morning, so I'm scheduling the first few hours of each day for thinking and protecting that time the same way I would if I have a committee meeting or an appointment scheduled with a student.  My email and phone will be off or silenced during this time, my door will be shut, and I'm going to share with my colleagues that a shut door means I'm not available.  That last piece is a little stressful for me, as someone who's always had a complete open-door policy with both her colleagues and students, but I know that this time is going to be more beneficial for the library than answering non-emergent questions that may arise.  We have a tendency in librarianship to treat every question or patron need like an emergency, when in fact, they rarely are. Practicing this schedule-blocking during the summer should help me build the habit so that when the fall semester begins, it'll feel normal.

Thinking time is valuable to all librarians, whether doing instruction, access services, technical services, public services--or more likely some combination of the above.  Innovation in any of these areas requires time and space, but no one's going to carve it out for you.  You have to take the initiative to make solutions that will give you time and then build it into your schedule and guard that time fiercely.  You'll be a better librarian for it and your library will certainly benefit from you taking the time to think deeply.

[1] Helen Sword, Air & Light & Time & Space: How Successful Academics Write 17 (2017).

[2] Id. at 18.

Popular posts from this blog

Why Experts Can Struggle to Teach Novices

This week in our Slack group on teaching , there was an interesting discussion about expertise and the amount of time needed to prep for instruction. I mentioned something that I recalled reading: that experts can be less effective in teaching novices because often the expert skips cognitive steps that the novice learner needs to understand.  I thought I'd dig into this a little more today on the blog. The fact is novices and experts learn very differently.  The major reason for this is that experts not only know a lot about their chosen discipline, but they understand how that discipline is organized. As such, what has a clear structure to the expert is a jumbled set of unorganized information to the novice.  The information presented to novices "are more or less random data points."[1]  In contrast, when the expert learns something new in her area of expertise, she just plugs it into the knowledge structure that already exists in her long-term memory. Because the new

Motivation in the Legal Research Classroom

Motivating students in the legal research classroom can be a challenge. As we know, there are many false narratives surrounding students' conceptions of legal research's importance, interest level, and ease, all of which can result in a decrease in students' motivation to engage in this subject matter. There are two types of motivation--intrinsic and extrinsic.  Extrinsic motivation occurs when students are motivated by an outside reward or punishment;[1] in instruction, this is often the grades students will get on research assignments or the participation points they might receive for actively engaging with in-class exercises.  Intrinsic motivation , on the other hand, occurs when students are interested in the topic for its own sake.[2] Due to legal research's false narratives, students entering our classrooms tend to be drive primarily by extrinsic motivation.  The problem is, as Julie Dirksen aptly notes in her excellent book Design for How People Learn , &qu

Helping With Student Focus & Motivation in the Remote Classroom, Part 3: Limiting New Technologies to Reduce Extrinsic Cognitive Load

A librarian colleague used to say to me, "Technology is great until it's not." This couldn't be more true in the classroom.  As many of us prepare for a fall entirely or partially online, there's a rush to familiarize ourselves with lots of new educational technology to teach our classes. There's this sense that if you're not using the best and newest ed tech in your class, you're doing something wrong. Fortunately, the science doesn't back this up.  Using too many different types of technology can be a contributing factor to cognitive overload in students . Cognitive load is a term cognitive psychologists use to describe the mental challenge that the limitations of working memory puts on a student's learning.[1] Basically, working memory is extremely limited in both time and duration. Humans can only hold on to between four and nine "chunks" of information at any given time,[2] and can only hold on to new information in their worki

The Power of Prediction in Legal Education

Are law students retaining what we teach? As educators, we should care that our students are taking their learning with them beyond our classes. To do so, we need to look to the science to discover ways that we can help our students to retain what they're learning. One evidence-based strategy for increasing retention is to use predictive activities in our classrooms. Predictive activities ask learners to give answers to questions or to anticipate outcomes about which they do not yet have sufficient information. They prepare our students' minds for learning by driving them to seek connections that help them to make accurate predictions. In doing so, students open up their minds to make connections between the new learning they're doing and the preexisting knowledge schema that exist in their long-term memories. By trying to answer questions without sufficient information to do so, it helps prepare the long-term memory to fit the new information into the preexisting knowledge

Reflection in the Legal Research Classroom

Reflection is a critical component of experiential learning.  We see in ABA Standard 303 that experiential courses must include multiple opportunities for self-evaluation.  Self-evaluation is critically important to legal research.  Students must reflect on and assess their research methodology each time they research to continue becoming more efficient legal researchers and to determine what research strategies work best in which situations. [1] Reflection relates to several ideas found in cognitive theory that have been shown to result in stronger learning and retention: Retrieval : recalling recently-learned information;  Elaboration : finding a nexis between what you know and what you are learning; and  Generation : putting concepts into your own words and/or contemplating what you might do differently next time. I've been contemplating how to better incorporate reflection into legal research classes. At the beginning of this semester, at the recommendation of a works