Skip to main content

Gratitude in Teaching

My favorite poet is Mary Oliver and what I love most about her work is the awe and gratefulness she exudes in merely observing the world.

She writes,
Instructions for living a life:
Pay attention.
Be astonished.
Tell about it.

This is, I think, good advice for teachers.  As teachers, we tend to focus in, with laser-like precision, on anything that goes wrong in our classrooms. This is important--we must reflect on what doesn't work in our classrooms to improve as instructors. But, what we too often fail to do is take note of our successes.

In Chapter 3 of her new book, Geeky Pedagogy: A Guide for Intellectuals, Introverts, and Nerds Who Want to Be Effective Teachers, Professor Jessamyn Neuhaus has a wonderful section on the importance of gratitude in teaching. She describes gratitude as "an inner attitude [that] leads to an expression of thanks--taking an action--toward someone or something. It means recognizing what you received from another person or from the circumstances in which you're living."[1]  She rightly observes that many parts of working in academia foster feelings of ingratitude--from cranky colleagues to unprepared students to clashing political agendas--and that we are likely not to be on the receiving end of others' gratitude much in this environment.[2] Like any other skill, one must practice gratitude. But I'm here to tell you, if you practice it, it can soon become second nature.

But why bother? First and foremost, practicing gratitude in the classroom, is good for your mental health. As Neuhaus explains, teaching is effortful and practicing gratitude "helps us see that in addition to the many things we have to give to our work as teachers and which deplete our personal resources, we also receive."[3] Gratitude, then, becomes a gift that can replenish us.

Beyond that, practicing gratitude can enhance student learning. When we practice gratitude, we reflect on what is working well in the classroom and during our interactions with students. We can use this knowledge to adjust our strategies and interactions in the classroom. Practicing gratitude can also make us happier to be in the classroom, which students undoubtedly pick up on; they know when we're excited to be there and it influences their desire to be there as well.

How can you be mindful about practicing gratitude?  Several years ago, I began taking a few minutes after each class to reflect on the session and annotate my syllabus with notes on that day's class. Up until about a year ago, those notes were exclusively about what didn't work. Last fall semester, I began requiring myself to identify at least one thing that went well. The more I did it, the more I was able to see the good things. Now, more often than not, the good far outweighs the things I want to improve on. Even the activity that didn't quite go the way I envisioned has become a plus, as I have an opportunity to rethink how I might do it differently next time. It's a simple way to practice gratitude that doesn't take up much time in our busy schedules.

My gratitude practice has also made me more mindful of how transformative it can be to give thanks to others. I've never wrote more thank you notes than I have in the past year and I've found that it's even better for my mental health than receiving thanks--and that practicing gratitude with others encourages them to practice it with you.  I've also switched to a planner that includes a space to jot down the "win of the day," so even on non-teaching days, I'm taking a minute to think about what went well. Keep in mind that practicing gratitude doesn't mean you're a saint; negative thoughts can and will still creep in, but I think you'll find that, with practice, grateful thoughts will come to mind more frequently.

However you decide to do it, follow Mary Oliver's advice: pay attention--especially to the good stuff, feel the buzz of joy that brings, and take a moment to share it (even if it's just in your own journal or annotated syllabus). It'll impact your teaching for the better.



[1] Jessamyn Neuhaus, Geeky Pedagogy: A Guide for Intellectual Introverts, and Nerds Who Want to Be Effective Teachers 114 (2019).

[2] Id. at 115

[3] Id. at 122.

Popular posts from this blog

Letter to A First-Time (Legal Research) Instructor

Dear Friend,

Seven years ago this week, I was prepping madly to teach my first legal research class.  Three months earlier, I'd been a law student myself.  To say that I was nervous is an understatement; mildly terrified was probably a more apt description.  The truth is I didn't really know what I was getting myself into, but I knew that I wanted to teach legal research differently than I had been taught legal research, where at best it was viewed as a skill less important than everything else being taught at law school and at worst an afterthought, a skill that students should be able to do with very little training. 

There are many points I wish I knew then that I know now and that's what I want to share with you today. 


First and foremost, students will forgive many imperfections in the classroom if they know you care about their learning.  At the start of every semester, I re-read Kent Syverud's "Taking Students Seriously: A Guide for New Law Teachers,"…

Rethinking Formative Assessment

We've seen an increased significance placed on formative assessment in the legal academy. Standard 314 of the ABA Standards requires that law schools use both formative and summative assessment methods in their curriculum. Its rational for doing so is "to measure and improve student learning and provide meaningful feedback to students." The ABA defines formative assessment methods as "measurements at different points during a particular course or at different points over the span of a student's education that provide meaningful feedback to improve student learning."

Those of us in the legal research instruction business are no strangers to formative assessment. We are leaders in this in the law school curriculum, with rarely a class going by in which students do not practice their skills. Lately, though, I've been wondering whether I'm going about formative assessment in the way that will best provide meaningful feedback to students. In the mandator…

16x16 Challenge, or How A Tweet Resulted in Building a Community of Law Librarians Thinking & Writing About Teaching

Twitter is a space in which I've made connections with so many Law Librarians and many others within legal academia--and strengthened connections with others--and learned so much from and been inspired by colleagues across the country.

This past weekend, Emily Barney, Technology Training & Marketing Librarian at Chicago-Kent College of Law, was live-tweeting a panel from the WP Campus (Where WordPress Meets Higher Education) Conference called "The Infamous 9x9x25 Challenge," by Todd Conaway, from the University of Washington--Bothell. Started in 2013 at a community college in Arizona, faculty members were challenged to write 25 sentences a week for 9 weeks about teaching and learning. It gave faculty members the chance to reflect on what they do, share experiences and ideas, and see what their colleagues are up to over the course of the semester. And the challenge has spread in various iterations to college campuses across the United States.

This seemed like a wonder…

Why Experts Can Struggle to Teach Novices

This week in our Slack group on teaching, there was an interesting discussion about expertise and the amount of time needed to prep for instruction. I mentioned something that I recalled reading: that experts can be less effective in teaching novices because often the expert skips cognitive steps that the novice learner needs to understand.  I thought I'd dig into this a little more today on the blog.

The fact is novices and experts learn very differently.  The major reason for this is that experts not only know a lot about their chosen discipline, but they understand how that discipline is organized. As such, what has a clear structure to the expert is a jumbled set of unorganized information to the novice.  The information presented to novices "are more or less random data points."[1]  In contrast, when the expert learns something new in her area of expertise, she just plugs it into the knowledge structure that already exists in her long-term memory. Because the new in…

Elaborative Interrogation in the Legal Research Classroom

One type of activity legal skills professors can incorporate into their classrooms is elaboration. As described by Yana Weinstein and Megan Sumeracki in Understanding How We Learn: A Visual Guide, "[e]laboration describes the process of adding features to one's memories."[1]  It helps with organization of information within the knowledge structures in one's minds, making it easier to retrieve this information later. But what activities will help students to add features to their memories?

Weinstein and Sumeracki recommend three elaboration techniques that can all be applied to the legal research classroom: elaborative interrogation, concrete examples, and dual coding.[2] Studies of each has shown improvement in student learning and long-term retention. Today, we're going to look specifically elaborative interrogation.

With elaborative interrogation, students ask themselves questions about the reason and way things work.[3]  While it's easy to presume law stud…