Skip to main content

Gratitude in Teaching

My favorite poet is Mary Oliver and what I love most about her work is the awe and gratefulness she exudes in merely observing the world.

She writes,
Instructions for living a life:
Pay attention.
Be astonished.
Tell about it.

This is, I think, good advice for teachers.  As teachers, we tend to focus in, with laser-like precision, on anything that goes wrong in our classrooms. This is important--we must reflect on what doesn't work in our classrooms to improve as instructors. But, what we too often fail to do is take note of our successes.

In Chapter 3 of her new book, Geeky Pedagogy: A Guide for Intellectuals, Introverts, and Nerds Who Want to Be Effective Teachers, Professor Jessamyn Neuhaus has a wonderful section on the importance of gratitude in teaching. She describes gratitude as "an inner attitude [that] leads to an expression of thanks--taking an action--toward someone or something. It means recognizing what you received from another person or from the circumstances in which you're living."[1]  She rightly observes that many parts of working in academia foster feelings of ingratitude--from cranky colleagues to unprepared students to clashing political agendas--and that we are likely not to be on the receiving end of others' gratitude much in this environment.[2] Like any other skill, one must practice gratitude. But I'm here to tell you, if you practice it, it can soon become second nature.

But why bother? First and foremost, practicing gratitude in the classroom, is good for your mental health. As Neuhaus explains, teaching is effortful and practicing gratitude "helps us see that in addition to the many things we have to give to our work as teachers and which deplete our personal resources, we also receive."[3] Gratitude, then, becomes a gift that can replenish us.

Beyond that, practicing gratitude can enhance student learning. When we practice gratitude, we reflect on what is working well in the classroom and during our interactions with students. We can use this knowledge to adjust our strategies and interactions in the classroom. Practicing gratitude can also make us happier to be in the classroom, which students undoubtedly pick up on; they know when we're excited to be there and it influences their desire to be there as well.

How can you be mindful about practicing gratitude?  Several years ago, I began taking a few minutes after each class to reflect on the session and annotate my syllabus with notes on that day's class. Up until about a year ago, those notes were exclusively about what didn't work. Last fall semester, I began requiring myself to identify at least one thing that went well. The more I did it, the more I was able to see the good things. Now, more often than not, the good far outweighs the things I want to improve on. Even the activity that didn't quite go the way I envisioned has become a plus, as I have an opportunity to rethink how I might do it differently next time. It's a simple way to practice gratitude that doesn't take up much time in our busy schedules.

My gratitude practice has also made me more mindful of how transformative it can be to give thanks to others. I've never wrote more thank you notes than I have in the past year and I've found that it's even better for my mental health than receiving thanks--and that practicing gratitude with others encourages them to practice it with you.  I've also switched to a planner that includes a space to jot down the "win of the day," so even on non-teaching days, I'm taking a minute to think about what went well. Keep in mind that practicing gratitude doesn't mean you're a saint; negative thoughts can and will still creep in, but I think you'll find that, with practice, grateful thoughts will come to mind more frequently.

However you decide to do it, follow Mary Oliver's advice: pay attention--especially to the good stuff, feel the buzz of joy that brings, and take a moment to share it (even if it's just in your own journal or annotated syllabus). It'll impact your teaching for the better.



[1] Jessamyn Neuhaus, Geeky Pedagogy: A Guide for Intellectual Introverts, and Nerds Who Want to Be Effective Teachers 114 (2019).

[2] Id. at 115

[3] Id. at 122.

Popular posts from this blog

The Power of Prediction in Legal Education

Are law students retaining what we teach? As educators, we should care that our students are taking their learning with them beyond our classes. To do so, we need to look to the science to discover ways that we can help our students to retain what they're learning. One evidence-based strategy for increasing retention is to use predictive activities in our classrooms. Predictive activities ask learners to give answers to questions or to anticipate outcomes about which they do not yet have sufficient information. They prepare our students' minds for learning by driving them to seek connections that help them to make accurate predictions. In doing so, students open up their minds to make connections between the new learning they're doing and the preexisting knowledge schema that exist in their long-term memories. By trying to answer questions without sufficient information to do so, it helps prepare the long-term memory to fit the new information into the preexisting knowledge

Why Experts Can Struggle to Teach Novices

This week in our Slack group on teaching , there was an interesting discussion about expertise and the amount of time needed to prep for instruction. I mentioned something that I recalled reading: that experts can be less effective in teaching novices because often the expert skips cognitive steps that the novice learner needs to understand.  I thought I'd dig into this a little more today on the blog. The fact is novices and experts learn very differently.  The major reason for this is that experts not only know a lot about their chosen discipline, but they understand how that discipline is organized. As such, what has a clear structure to the expert is a jumbled set of unorganized information to the novice.  The information presented to novices "are more or less random data points."[1]  In contrast, when the expert learns something new in her area of expertise, she just plugs it into the knowledge structure that already exists in her long-term memory. Because the new

Elaborative Interrogation in the Legal Research Classroom

One type of activity legal skills professors can incorporate into their classrooms is elaboration. As described by Yana Weinstein and Megan Sumeracki in Understanding How We Learn: A Visual Guide , "[e]laboration describes the process of adding features to one's memories."[1]  It helps with organization of information within the knowledge structures in one's minds, making it easier to retrieve this information later. But what activities will help students to add features to their memories? Weinstein and Sumeracki recommend three elaboration techniques that can all be applied to the legal research classroom: elaborative interrogation, concrete examples, and dual coding.[2] Studies of each has shown improvement in student learning and long-term retention. Today, we're going to look specifically elaborative interrogation. With elaborative interrogation , students ask themselves questions about the reason and way things work.[3]  While it's easy to presume law

Reflection in the Legal Research Classroom

Reflection is a critical component of experiential learning.  We see in ABA Standard 303 that experiential courses must include multiple opportunities for self-evaluation.  Self-evaluation is critically important to legal research.  Students must reflect on and assess their research methodology each time they research to continue becoming more efficient legal researchers and to determine what research strategies work best in which situations. [1] Reflection relates to several ideas found in cognitive theory that have been shown to result in stronger learning and retention: Retrieval : recalling recently-learned information;  Elaboration : finding a nexis between what you know and what you are learning; and  Generation : putting concepts into your own words and/or contemplating what you might do differently next time. I've been contemplating how to better incorporate reflection into legal research classes. At the beginning of this semester, at the recommendation of a works

Motivation in the Legal Research Classroom

Motivating students in the legal research classroom can be a challenge. As we know, there are many false narratives surrounding students' conceptions of legal research's importance, interest level, and ease, all of which can result in a decrease in students' motivation to engage in this subject matter. There are two types of motivation--intrinsic and extrinsic.  Extrinsic motivation occurs when students are motivated by an outside reward or punishment;[1] in instruction, this is often the grades students will get on research assignments or the participation points they might receive for actively engaging with in-class exercises.  Intrinsic motivation , on the other hand, occurs when students are interested in the topic for its own sake.[2] Due to legal research's false narratives, students entering our classrooms tend to be drive primarily by extrinsic motivation.  The problem is, as Julie Dirksen aptly notes in her excellent book Design for How People Learn , &qu